<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 7:35 AM, <span dir="ltr"><Gareth.Williams@csiro.au></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
-snip-<br>
<div class="im">> Thanks for your reply. It doesn't sound like being able to 'overload' things is important to you, but I will point out that this would still be possible by claiming that there are more cpus than actually exist on the system. I think that there are some sites that do this (although I'm not completely certain who). <br>
</div>-snip-<br>
<br>
> David<br>
<br>
Hi David,<br>
<br>
'claiming that there are more cpus than actually exist' will not easily work with integrated cpuset support. It might be nice to have a sort of detailed cpuset overloading but we're hard up enough getting what we have to be solid.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>In the past we have told people not to do this if they are going to use cpusets. I'm not really sure what the best way to handle that would be although we could think of something if this is something that people are hoping to figure out.</div>
<div><br></div><div>David</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Gareth<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
torqueusers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:torqueusers@supercluster.org">torqueusers@supercluster.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers" target="_blank">http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/torqueusers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div>David Beer | Software Engineer</div><div>Adaptive Computing</div><br>