<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Chris Vaughan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:chris@adaptivecomputing.com">chris@adaptivecomputing.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><span><div><span>Hi,</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I see there are multiple compilers you can specify for compiling torque, I've always used the default. Are there any performance increases in using another compiler other than the standard gcc? Has anyone ever tried it?</span></div>
<div><span><br></span></div><div><span><div>Some influential environment variables:</div><div> CC C compiler command</div><div> CXX C++ compiler command</div><div> F77 Fortran 77 compiler command</div>
</span></div><div><span><br></span></div></span><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>CXX and F77 won't matter in compiling torque because C++/fortran compilers aren't used. I doubt you would see a noticeable difference using a commercial C compiler like Intel or Portland Group to compile TORQUE because it isn't CPU bound. <br>