<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 06/10/2010 09:36 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:D45958078CD65C429557B4C5F492B6A60770E61B@IS-EX-BEV3.unimelb.edu.au"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator"
content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7654.12">
<title>Re: [torquedev] nodes, procs, tpn and ncpus</title>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<p><font size="2">-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
On 11/06/10 04:47, Glen Beane wrote:<br>
<br>
> In my opinion, I think nodes=X,procx=Y should generate<br>
> a syntax error...<br>
<br>
Agreed.</font><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
I am not swayed one way or another yet. What if a user makes a request
like the following<br>
<br>
-l nodes=4:ppn=2+procs=6<br>
<br>
The user wants four nodes with two processors each and then 6
processors anywhere they are available.<br>
<br>
-l nodes=4+procs=4<br>
<br>
The user wants 4 nodes plus 4 processors anywhere. This one makes less
sense than the first, but if we allow the first we need to allow this
as well.<br>
<br>
Thoughts anyone?<br>
<br>
Ken<br>
</body>
</html>