[torquedev] Job array feature request

[Glen Beane]

On 11/20/07, Garrick Staples <garrick at usc.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 07:19:29AM -0500, Glen Beane alleged:
> > On 11/20/07, Chris Samuel <csamuel at vpac.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Glen Beane wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have no problem changing the syntax
> > >
> > > That's great - I had a peak at the code but (a) I'm not a programmer
> > > and (b) I was almost asleep but I did manage to work out that it was
> > > going to be a lot harder than I thought!
> >
> > I have an issue I need to fix with job arrays, then I will start
> > working on the new syntax
> >
> > Should we keep the old behavior with qsub -t and add qsub -T?
>
> Go ahead and change -t.  It is still a very new feature and I wouldn't worry
> about it yet.

Sounds good to me.