[Moabusers] software license management

Steven A. DuChene linux-clusters at mindspring.com
Wed Oct 4 15:43:10 MDT 2006


We have users doing this on a regular basis. The syntax they are using is:

qsub -l nodes=$_RUN_NODES:ppn=2,walltime=$_RUN_TIME:00:00 -W x=GRES:fluent+$_SERPROC,fluent-par+$_PARPROC some_fluent_batch_job_script

This is a snipet from a larger script, thus the $variables

-----Original Message-----
>From: Josh Butikofer <josh at clusterresources.com>
>Sent: Oct 4, 2006 1:45 PM
>To: Lloyd Brown <somewhere_or_other at byu.edu>
>Cc: moabusers at supercluster.org
>Subject: Re: [Moabusers] software license management
>
>Lloyd,
>
>I believe the format is:
>
>qsub -l nodes=10:ppn=2,software=fluent+1,fluent-par+10 cmdscript.txt
>
>I'll update the docs to show examples of multiple license requests like this.
>
>-- 
>Joshua Butikofer
>Cluster Resources, Inc.
>
>josh at clusterresources.com
>Voice: (801) 717-3707
>Fax:   (801) 717-3738
>--------------------------
>
>
>Lloyd Brown wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> In the Moab documentation (section 13.7), it talks about setting up
>> resource managers to monitor license managers, etc.  We've gotten that
>> set up, and 'mdiag -n' has output like this:
>> 
>>> NODE[GLOBAL] Config Res     fluent: 8  fluent-nox: 8  fluent-par: 24  fluent-post: 4  fluentall: 8  gambit: 8  geom-trans: 8
>>> NODE[GLOBAL] Dedicated Res  ---
>>> NODE[GLOBAL] Available Res  fluent: 8  fluent-nox: 8  fluent-par: 23  fluent-post: 4  fluentall: 7  gambit: 8  geom-trans: 8
>> 
>> 
>> So, it looks it's being monitored correctly.  However, when it describes
>> how to request the resources (see
>> http://www.clusterresources.com/products/mwm/docs/13.7licensemanagement.shtml#requesting),
>> it only shows how to request one type of license.  So, for example, what
>> syntax do I pass to torque's qsub when I want to reserve 1 fluent
>> license, and 10 fluent-par licenses?  I'm guessing it'd be something
>> like this:
>> 
>>> qsub -l nodes=10:ppn=2,software=fluent:1,fluent-par:10 cmdscript.txt
>> 
>> Can someone verify this syntax, or if I'm wrong, tell me what it should be?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Lloyd Brown
>> _______________________________________________
>> moabusers mailing list
>> moabusers at supercluster.org
>> http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/moabusers
>_______________________________________________
>moabusers mailing list
>moabusers at supercluster.org
>http://www.supercluster.org/mailman/listinfo/moabusers



More information about the moabusers mailing list